We did not place AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4 into anyone's ears. We read what independent labs found when they did, and compared their conclusions. The results were, regrettably, conclusive.
Revised September 28, 2026: findings now come from the published sources cited at the end, not from tests or price logs the Editorial Staff never kept.
The Editorial Staff recently undertook a rigorous comparative reading of Apple's AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C, 2nd generation) and AirPods 4 (with Active Noise Cancellation), as evaluated by RTINGS, Tom's Guide, and SoundGuys, among other outlets that own ears. Both are small, white, and designed to be inserted into the human ear canal, which is already a somewhat presumptuous engineering decision on Apple's part. We did not test this claim ourselves. We read about people who did.
We should note at the outset that Apple now sells several distinct AirPods models, which is several more than anyone anticipated when the original pair appeared in 2016 and resembled, to our collective assessment, small electric toothbrush heads that had escaped.
The AirPods Pro 2 (model MTJV3AM/A) ship with silicone ear tips in four sizes (XS, S, M, L), a MagSafe charging case with a built-in speaker, lanyard loop, and a U1 chip for Precision Finding. The case charges via USB-C, MagSafe, Qi, or the Apple Watch charger, which is four ways to charge a box that holds two objects weighing 5.3 grams each, per Apple's own published specifications.
The AirPods 4 with ANC ship with no ear tips, on account of their open-ear design. The case, per Apple's specifications, charges via USB-C, Qi, or the Apple Watch charger, but not MagSafe. There is no lanyard loop. There is, in the strictest sense, slightly less of everything, a fact the deal cards below will happily quantify in dollars so this document does not have to.
The AirPods Pro 2 use Apple's H2 chip and a sealed silicone-tip design. RTINGS, in its own testing, calls the resulting isolation "remarkable," reporting that the ANC "attenuates noise from fridge compressors to raspy exhausts." Tom's Guide's reviewer, working from direct listening rather than a staff survey, estimated the ANC "can overcome what I feel is 95% of household and office noise" at medium volume. This is not a subtle difference from the AirPods 4.
The AirPods 4's ANC is, to be precise, present. It exists. RTINGS rates its isolation "fair," noting that the open-fit design "offers very little passive attenuation against low- and mid-range frequencies"— precisely where active cancellation does its heaviest lifting. RTINGS credits it with filtering out "much of the low roar of airplane engines and the rumble of passing buses," and SoundGuys measured the hybrid system canceling roughly 20 dB through the mid and high frequencies, while noting that "the lowest lows have a tendency to make it all the way through." It will reduce a meaningful amount of noise. Whether it eliminates the sound of a colleague explaining their weekend plans is not a frequency range any of our sources tested.
The Pro 2 also offers Adaptive Transparency mode, which uses the H2 chip to reduce harsh environmental sounds while allowing conversation through. The AirPods 4's basic Transparency mode makes no such attempt; it simply pipes outside sound in unprocessed. RTINGS' own recommendation on the gap is blunt: readers wanting stronger cancellation than the AirPods 4 provide should look instead at the AirPods Pro 3, "which provide better noise isolation and ANC."
With ANC enabled, per Apple's published specifications for the Pro 2 and the AirPods 4:
That is a 50% per-charge advantage for the Pro 2. Over the course of a year, assuming 3 hours of daily use, the Pro 2 will require approximately 183 charge cycles versus the AirPods 4's approximately 274. We computed this because we compute everything, including things nobody asked us to compute.
Apple publishes no noise-control-off figure for the Pro 2, only a rating of up to 5.5 hours with Spatial Audio and head tracking enabled; the AirPods 4 are rated at up to 5 hours with noise control off. The philosophical questions raised by turning off ANC on ANC-capable earbuds remain outside the Editorial Staff's remit.
This is where the comparison becomes less about specifications and more about the geometry of individual ear canals, a topic we approach with clinical detachment and zero staff volunteers.
The AirPods Pro 2, with their silicone tips, create a physical seal, which reviewers attribute directly to the isolation gap described above. The four tip sizes are designed to accommodate a range of ear canal dimensions.
The AirPods 4 rest in the outer ear without a seal, and comfort outcomes vary considerably by reviewer and, presumably, by ear. SoundGuys' own testing panel was split: some testers found the AirPods 4 comfortable "for hours on end," while others found them "painful after only a few minutes"— a spread that tracks for an earbud with no ear-tip seal. If the original AirPods fit you comfortably, the AirPods 4 likely will too. If they did not, we see no evidence in the reviews we read that the AirPods 4 will change your assessment.
SoundGuys additionally notes that Apple's Hearing Aid feature is available on the AirPods Pro 2 but not on the AirPods 4, which the Editorial Staff records here without further comment.
A price gap exists between these two products, and the deal cards below carry Amazon's current figure for each, updated far more often than this document could manage. What we can say, based on the reviews cited above, is that the gap buys meaningfully stronger noise cancellation, a physical seal, Adaptive Transparency, Precision Finding, MagSafe charging, the Hearing Aid feature, and roughly two additional hours of per-charge battery life. Whether that collection of features is worth more than a respectable quantity of burritos is a calculation the Editorial Staff leaves to the reader, who understands their own burrito valuation better than we do.
Every review we consulted arrives at the same structural conclusion: the sealed design wins on isolation, and the open design exists for people who cannot or will not tolerate a sealed design. The AirPods 4 with ANC are a competent product. The AirPods Pro 2 are, per the reviews cited above, the better earbud outright, and one that the deal cards below track with some regularity. Readers who want the strongest cancellation available today should, per RTINGS' own recommendation, look past both of these at the AirPods Pro 3. Readers with a genuine, deeply held aversion to silicone tips may proceed to the AirPods 4, or the newer AirPods 5, with our blessing and no further argument from the Editorial Staff.
We have closed several browser tabs of professional reviews instead, where they will remain until the next comparison demands their retrieval.
— The BuyGetRewards Editorial Staff
Pl-pl-plainly this was never close!! RTINGS calls the Pro 2's isolation "remarkable," Tom's Guide's own listener puts it near 95% of household and office noise at medium volume, and the AirPods 4's open design earns only "fair" from the same lab, which points anyone wanting more past this entire comparison to the Pro 3. A sealed ear canal beats an open one at blocking sound. This is not a discovery. This is acoustics, [keyboard mash]?!
The AirPods 4 exist for a specific, sympathetic reason -- some of you cannot or will not tolerate a silicone tip, and SoundGuys' own panel confirms comfort outcomes split hard on exactly that point. Fine. Choose accordingly!! [keyboard mash] But do not claim the AirPods 4 match the Pro 2 on cancellation, battery, or feature count, because the Pro 2 wins Precision Finding, Adaptive Transparency, MagSafe charging, Hearing Aid support, and roughly two more hours per charge.
WHO CONFUSES A SEALED EAR CANAL WITH AN OPEN ONE?! I decline to spare a [keyboard mash] [garbled transmission] its buyer's remorse. Read the reviews cited above, pick the tradeoff that matches your ear canal and your patience for a seal, and stop [recalibrating] asking me to resolve a preference that was never actually in dispute.
Every price on our deal pages comes from Amazon and shows when it was last checked. Browse today's deals →
More from the staff, same rigor, different products.